LiST: Lives Saved Tool

Langston, A.C., D.M. Prosnitz, and E.G. Sarriot, Neglected value of small population-based surveys: a comparison with demographic and health survey data. J Health Popul Nutr, 2015. 33(1): p. 123-36.

Summary

We believe that global health practice and evaluation operate with misleading assumptions about lack of reliability of small population-based health surveys (district level and below), leading managers and decision-makers to under-use this valuable information and programmatic tool and to rely on health information from large national surveys when neither timing nor available data meet their needs. This paper uses a unique opportunity for comparison between a knowledge, practice, and coverage (KPC) household survey and Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) carried out in overlapping timeframes to disprove these enduring suspicions. Our analysis shows that the KPC provides coverage estimates consistent with the RDHS estimates for the same geographic areas. We discuss cases of divergence between estimates. Application of the Lives Saved Tool to the KPC results also yields child mortality estimates comparable with DHS-measured mortality. We draw three main lessons from the study and conclude with recommendations for challenging unfounded assumptions against the value of small household coverage surveys, which can be a key resource in the arsenal of local health programmers.

Go to article

Featured News

LiST team member authors paper on child survival in Peru

October 28, 2016 Yvonne Tam, Research Associate and LiST team member authored a recent publication that projected the impact of universal and equitable health coverage on child mortality in Peru.

Read more ...
Go to top